Dallas-Fort Worth experienced the second largest numeric population increase 0f 842,000, reaching about 6 million people by July 2006. Houston, Phoenix, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, were the other three of the top five fastest growing markets. The five metro areas experiencing the greatest numeric change between 2000 and 2006 were in the South or West.
The New Orleans metropolitan area experienced the greatest population loss of 292,000 over the period 2000-2006. It was followed by Pittsburgh with a decrease of 60,000 and Cleveland with a decrease of 34,000.
The ten metro areas with highest numerical growth over the period 2000-2006 are the following:
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA: 890,211
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX: 842,449
Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX: 824,547
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ: 787,306
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA: 771,314
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA: 584,510
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA: 495,154
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-W.Va: 494,220
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL: 455,869
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, Ill.-Ind.-WI: 407,133
Regional Distribution of Growth
The 50 fastest-growing metro areas were almost evenly distributed between just two regions — 23 in the West and 25 in the South. One metro area, Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, Ark.-Mo., straddled both the South and Midwest regions. Sioux Falls, S.D., was the lone metro area among the top 50 fastest-growing located completely in the Midwest. Of the 50 fastest-growing metro areas, none were in the Northeast. York-Hanover, Pa., the fastest-growing metro area in the Northeast, ranked 95th.
The Northeast metro area with the greatest numeric change between 2000 and 2006 was New York (seventh overall nationally), while the Midwest metro area with the greatest numeric change over the same period was Chicago (10th overall nationally).
Return from Fastest Growing Markets to Market Watch